You might be wondering why you need this workshop I will tell you the reason is because we decided to have it as sort of as model the experience that you’re going to go through right all of you are more than likely going to be servants dropped into a situation where you’re expected to do all sorts of things in the classroom and you have not done before and teach areas that you’re not familiar with or you know that you are tangential to your area of expertise I so we thought the way to leap to show you how you might go right about that would be to have somebody who who hasn’t done that sort of puzzle out of how we would go about putting this together. Learn more about possible difficulties with research at Edusson.

And the way that he puzzled it out it is sort of through and you see in the help of people who have done it right so he’s been working with me to figure out to introduce students to different types of resources at the library and also met with a number of consulted with number of but students who had thought the PA seminar in religion and so they have gone through taken students do that long process of writing their PhD C and so I just wanna by way of a plug sort of to say that when you I think when you start teaching the house just in general when you start teaching but especially when you start teaching at different institutions I want to make sure that you are aware that you can contact the librarians at that institution and they are there to help you with anything that might come up with your teaching it’s often the case with adjunct in that you serve if you get hired and then they just you know let you go and there’s not as much checking up on you which on the one hand is nice because you know.

They trust you to do their job that on the other hand can be you know frustrating because you don’t know if you’re doing the right thing and you’re not sure how the system works because it’s not your University in Bogota librarians are a great resource in that situation and other faculty are good resources too but oftentimes you might get the most help from the like parents so they’ll have and they should have all sorts of resources already set up and ready for you to take advantage of I suspect if and oh my god you already know about the research guides so we have the religion resource guide these live guides are pretty standard now across America a u.s. North American universities and so they’re more than likely any college or university that you work at is going to have something similar like this for their for their various them right maybe put together by their various subject specialists and of course while you’re still a student here you can use mine you can access all of this information through your as an affiliate of the United States of Chicago.

In preparation for you to make your own outline we’re going to look at one more sample argumentative essay and we’re going to outline the structure of that essay and then we are going to move on and I will demonstrate what you’re going to do tomorrow which is create an outline for your own research essay and I’ll show you the expectations towards the end of this video so you need to start with what want to go through is this one right here and you’ll see argumentative essay sample too and you’ll notice that the first line is the hook of the introduction and the statements gets people aware of the scope of the issue so it’s marijuana is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States it’s a big statement that kind of captures the scope of the issue. Read more examples of argumentative essays on Edusson.

And you’ll see that in the introduction then it follows with some statistics which is different from yesterday’s essay because if you look at yesterday’s essay what it does is for the sample 1 it starts with a statement about the the observations of the new study it goes to the thesis and then it gives a piece of a piece of information from the conclusion of that particular study so it it has this quote here this qualitative assessment after the after the thesis and this essay is structured differently by giving you the evidence the statistical evidence here so those are two different ways to start now what you’ll notice with this one also essay number two is you notice that this kind of seems like a thesis statement despite some viewpoints the marijuana is harmless these figures present a sobering picture of this drugs very real and serious harms and that may seem like a thesis but if you keep reading they actually get much more specific and their thesis down here is marijuana presents a major challenge for health care profession providers public safety professionals and leaders and communities in all levels of government seeking to reduce the drug use and its consequences throughout the country.

So the thesis is that it presents a major challenge and it’s because of its it’s damaging so that’s the thesis right there it’s a much more specific thesis and if you compare it to yesterday’s thesis you can see that that’s also a specific thesis that the finding could be extremely significant as many colleges that continue to rely on SAT may be less comfortable doing so so you want to work to have your thesis specific like that as well and not just a general it’s good or bad kind of thesis if you scroll down then the first sub point is there a significant public discussion around marijuana much of which includes terms legalization dis criminalization of medical marijuana and the first sub point is just giving definitions of those terms it’s very short and if you notice yesterday the first sub point was the history of the SAT and racial patterns that were discovered or claimed based on studies.

Planning is essential and I would say looking back on seeing my a-levels climbing if he was doing the GGC essay is still essential because it means you get the perfect structure and it means your ideas flow and you’re not just kind of mumbling on because you’ve forgotten you’ve already said that point something you know I’m going to stop it I know a woman owes and come back so how I personally plan is I slip it into the different book and I make sure that as for each book title and then each key point from each of the books so I know what key points belong to which book when I come to write them in the exam I know exactly which one I’m citing where that’s the third thing that isn’t by no means the whole class that’s just to sort your ideas out so that it’s not just in your face and in like spread across the whole cable.

So what I have to do next after a flip them is look back at the questionnaire carefully because sometimes it’s the teutuls feeling nice things written a big paragraph about what they want to see in your earthly now they don’t always do this in fact it’s quite rare but my last essay they did do that I’m very grateful because it meant that I could then split my plan into each of these individual questions and then link books and fact that I’ve remembered all these different things and I’ll show you that now so this is the essay that I’m writing as you can see in and make this passage does um a lot of questions that he’s put on questions that were in like the yellow bit that I’ve highlighted I’ve split so that they’re all separate and I’ve put in read the bits that I remember from my reading and where I think they could go and some references to the texture that’s a book and a page number okay so now you’ve seen my plan you visualize what I’m one telling it and I can tell you some other methods of culling I’ve had people do so.

I’ve seen people do tables if it’s like a foreign against death day I’ve seen people I threw her if you’ve heard of what they called the words that meaning like discussing that so be discussed it’s all you a if you’re in a little you teachers of banished them out at you like people GG if I discussed FA that would basically translate to a Berlioz argument of my opinion because if I’m discussing I’m discussing what I think so it will be a subjective essay now because of that and I need to then plan my response to each thing said in the book so I would say write out a quote and then write on my opinion of that and do it for all different ones and then maybe sort it into one side of the argument on the other side of the argument and that would be pretty similar for most of the essay questions if you get it could be compared to be discussed it could be evaluate they all pretty much mean the same thing so as all you a would be you’d be comparing be contrasting you’d be like saying which one’s useful which ones aren’t useful and basically in your plan you can just sort them into different sections that’s how I plan those you could comment down below how you would apply then I can learn from you probably.

Five paragraph essays have never been easier Essay Writing Service to teach! This instructional unit contains everything you need to take your students from sentence writers to five paragraph essay authors!

I love the process of teaching writing to my students. They begin the year with short, incomplete sentences but by the time I’m done with them, they can write excellent five paragraph essays. I have had many teachers ask me to share my process for teaching the five paragraph essay. Until this point, I haven’t had any guides or worksheets to share with them because it was just an internal knowledge for me. So, I took the time to create this guide and detail my process for teaching writing. You will find everything you need to teach and assess five paragraph essays! I hope this product is helpful to you in your classroom and that your students benefit from using it!

This blog post will help as you dive into five paragraph essays with your students!

Topics Covered in this Instructional Unit:

* Planning and Writing Simple Paragraphs

* Planning the Body Paragraphs

* Writing the Body Paragraphs

* Color-Coding Reference Materials

* Writing an Introduction Paragraph (includes hook and thesis sentence)

* Introduction PLUS Body Paragraphs

* Adding Transitions (Transition Teams)

* Writing a Conclusion Paragraph

* Writing and Scoring Five Paragraph Essays

* Five Paragraph Essay Organizer

* Five Paragraph Essay Rubric

* Become the Teacher – Read and Score 3 Five Paragraph Essays

Remember to follow my store to receive new product updates and sales alerts! Just click the “Follow Me” star!

ESSAY WRITING RESOURCES: This essay bundle contains all the documents you will need to teach your high school (or late middle school) students proper essay writing. With engaging Powerpoint presentations, fun activities, graphic organizers, checklists, and more, your students will understand the essay writing process from start to finish.

WHAT TEACHERS ARE SAYING ABOUT THIS RESOURCE:

♥ Great package. As a new teacher sometimes it’s difficult to find the time to do EVERYTHING for your students. This package put into words everything I was hoping to teach my grade 9’s and 10’s. It’s informative, eye catching and easy to explain/understand. Totally worth the $$.

♥ This bundle is perfect for covering the basic parts of teaching essay writing! It has saved me so much time and enabled me to present similar content in a different way without putting in all the time myself to re-do my own presentations. The handouts (MLA Guidebook and Academic Writing Dictionary) are excellent–concise and compact reminders for students. Thank you so much!

♥ This was a great resource to use with my inexperienced writers. I was able to use a step by step method and the handouts were very helpful.

 

View More

“Welcome to the neighborhood”

Alright, so that’s not exactly the welcome the Mattsons received when moving into Lakeview Terrace, but with Abel Turner (Samuel L. Jackson) as a bigoted next door neighbor who has an interracial yuppie couple (Patrick Wilson and Kerry Washington) move in next door, it’s easy to see where it’s headed even before the movie really gets going.  From the first time Abel mistakes Chris for a member of the moving crew to the shady look he gives him as he kisses his wife, to reminding the rap-loving Chris that he’ll always be white to… well, you get the idea.  Abel, to put it mildly, doesn’t like Chris or the thought of his interracial marriage, nor does the fact that he is a cigarette-smoking, liberal, college educated, Prius-driving, white collar worker really help his case with the blue collar, traditional and strict-as hell-Abel.  It is this racial/cultural conflict that drives Abel to start harassing Chris and his wife before they even have a chance to unpack.

Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem that subtlety is director Neil LaBute’s strong suit and for about the first half of the movie, we’re reminded over… and over… and over again that this is a movie conflicting black and white, conservative and liberal (almost uncomfortably so at points) and most memorably during a house-warming party that was anything but.  What might’ve been a subtle but powerful theme of  racial/cultural differences and the ongoing challenge of interracial marriage is instead vastly overblown to the brink of absurdity and past, losing any point it was trying to make in the process.  By the time Lakeview Terrace started picking up steam, it actually caught me by surprise, as I had resigned myself to the latter issues for some time.

Truth be told, once it got going, it became a pretty entertaining movie.  Samuel L. has proven quite capable of carrying mediocre material into the decent category, and this was no exception.  As the narrow-minded, twisted, and utterly out-of-control Abel, Jackson easily convinces you of the instability that makes him such an intriguing villain, as I was never sure where his limits lied (if anywhere).  It was clear throughout that no aspect of his life was under control, be it was work, family or community.  The same was eventually made true of the Mattsons; what started off as a peaceful new beginning for them quickly spiraled out of control along the same lines, much thanks to Abel’s meddling in their lives.  While it created the chaos necessary to build to a climax, it also made the entire movie feel bleak, as though even if everything resolved in the end, only the utter wreckage of once-happy lives would remain.

While Jackson is strong, and Wilson and Washington both play their parts well enough to convince, the tension that was built throughout the entire movie doesn’t boil over as successfully as was intended, even if they blatantly tried to put an incoming wildfire climax to convince us otherwise.  Oftentimes during the concluding scenes, I found the suspense and anxiety less than convincing and despite my best efforts to be on the edge of my seat, it just wasn’t happening this time.  Lakeview Terrace certainly had its moments but the true great thrillers maintain the same edge throughout; here, it was found only in spurts.  Entertaining, to be sure, but what seemed like a promising premise and cast just wasn’t executed at anywhere above an average level for the drama.

For some racially charged moments, entertainment and some mild thrills, Lakeview Terrace delivers, but don’t expect anything incredible from the latest in a long line of B movie thrillers.

3 / 5 stars

“Rock me, Rock me Jesus!”

That is the catchy hook to the new indie comedy hit of the summer, Hamlet 2, starring the brilliant Steve Coogan as a down-and-out actor who puts on the best high school musical theatre play of all time (also titled Hamlet 2) It wasn’t all by choice though, as the school tries first to close down the drama department and then shut down the play itself. The film does a great job of tying all those elements and variables together to create a very relatable film with characters that seem real enough to hang out with, even if some are parodies of stereotypes of characters in high school “redemption films” (like Dangerous Minds, for example).

The writers are even nice enough to point which inspiration was where to the audience.  It gives lots of “Aha!” moments that really give some humanity to Coogan’s slightly demented and neurotic character, Dana Marschz. Catherine Keener plays his wife Brie almost as well as her role in An American Crime; she brings comedy and high drama to a role that could have been easily gotten lost in the fluff. David Arquette also stars in this film as Gary, the BORE-der in the Marshz home, and his performance (or lack thereof) really keeps the film going through some of the uncomfortable dramatic scenery.

The comedic stylings are very much in the same vein of Tropic Thunder, which also,  ironically, starred Steve Coogan. The similarities come into play as the jokes are centered on the craft of the performance rather than the performance itself. Sure, there is slapstick, but there are also complex jokes that audiences of all ages can enjoy again and again.

However, in terms of context of the content, Juno would be more in line of the where this film is going with its controversy. It is an interesting dynamic that actually gets pulled off very well in the film, but you’ll have to see it but since to truly appreciate how it gets to the crux of the matter.  Just be happy to know most of the jokes are not in the trailer, which is a very common complaint with some comedies.

All in all, this was a very entertaining film that celebrates the art of art. Steve Coogan’s slightly over-the-top performance is balanced by Catherine Keener’s calm demeanor and David Arquette’s supremely understated performance. The actual musical itself was pretty fun even if there is more than a little a bit of weirdness in the plot. I give this film a high recommendation if you are looking for some quirky comedy before school starts up again!

5 / 5 stars

Ludivine Sagnier entered the American public consciousness with Swimming Pool. Then she took us through a musical threesome in Love Songs.  Now she plays an innocent weather-girl caught in the middle of love and money in A Girl Cut in Two. This is a story about a naïve girl that falls for an older man, an author named Charles Saint-Denis (François Berléand).  However, after the man that she believes to be the love of her life breaks down her innocence, their relationship ends very badly.  Lost in a fog of confusion, she goes back to a young and demented heir to a pharmaceutical company, Paul Gaudens, (Benoît Magimel) she had been courting earlier, little knowing the descent into madness that step will take.

A Girl has been advertised as a dark comedy, and there are some comedic moments, but on a whole this movie is more powerful in the insanity of it all, rather than the dry wit contained in some of the zingers the characters throw at each other.  One thing that I really liked was the performances by the lead actors in this film. The pacing might have been slightly off, and the jokes occasionally missed, but the actors were on top of their game. Magimel’s portrayal as Gaudens, a young millionaire (who was also a mentally disturbed mama’s boy), was spectacular.  There were little tics he had, like covering his mouth, that really brought his character to life. So when he spoke of his jealousy, I could really feel it. Sagnier also did remarkably well, from her early wide-eyed performance in the scene when she met Saint-Denis, to her calculated decision to take on her previously rebuffed young man; her character arc is the biggest in the film.  The director does a good job making her the focus since it is pretty hard to like any of the other male leads. But in order to regain the viewer’s trust, she loses her naiveté and starts to fight for her own rights, which begins the climax of the story.

If there was one big thing wrong with A Girl, it was that the film’s pacing was a bit too meandering at times. In fact, it was pretty slow, even for a dialogue-driven film. And the film also used a technique where the viewer would know what’s happening, but one of the characters didn’t.  This is not necessarily a bad thing, as it brought interaction between the film and the audience, but it was a little frustrating because it took some of the edge off the film’s few comedic moments.

A Girl Cut In Two is a good flick. I’d give it a pretty strong recommendation for some change-of-pace viewing or if you are in the mood for a slightly comedic thriller.

3 / 5 stars

Adding to the often hollow words exchanged by the two main characters, were the bad ensemble cast. This is very heavily an ensemble film, and the sequels will be even more so, so I was devastated to see the Cullens (Rosalie, Emmett, Alice, Jasper, Carlisle, and Esme) exceed my expectations as individuals, but never quite mesh as a group.

At best the interactions between them were wooden, not something you expect from a family who have been together for decades. To make matters worse, their pale face makeup looked fairly ridiculous (when the film introduces Carlisle, at many angles he actually appears GREEN!), Jasper as a wide-eyed newly turned vampire winds up looking more like a zombie for the majority of the film.

Along with the makeup the special effects were downright atrocious; again they did what they could with the budget they had I expect. Most times when Edward is running or climbing, you can practically see the wires and harness, there is little fluidity of movement – with the exception of one scene in which Bella drops an apple and Edward pops it up with his foot.  The action sequences are far overdone; I suspect this was an attempt to fill in what they couldn’t afford to do with high end effects, with overacted movements, which left me thinking B-movie.  Finally, the numerous instances where speech was dubbed in over unmoving lips or lips were moving but no sound, was extremely unsettling – I don’t know much about film or sound editing, so it has to be bad if I caught it.

Overall, I was pleased to watch an on screen adaptation of a story I’ve come to love, but my greatest hope is that this will simply act as the stepping stone to a big budget production on the next installment.

3 ½ / 5 stars

The actors playing Mike and Jessica are definitely standouts that I expect to see in the future; they both played up their teen characters realistically and age appropriately, as is so rarely done. Though she doesn’t directly meet the Cullens her first day, everyone has something to say about them in whispers when she asks who they are.

After an extremely confusing scene in Biology class, she becomes more intrigued with the elegant Edward Cullen, and begins stealing glances and asking questions. Finally their paths collide, literally, when Edward jumps in front of Bella to stop a reckless van in the school parking lot, raising even more questions about him. Amazingly, Bella still takes awhile (painfully long, in fact) to piece together what Edward’s pale skin, unbelievable speed, and inhuman strength all mean… he’s a vampire. This instant of interaction sets them on an immediate course to falling head-over-heels for each other, despite both of their better judgments.

As someone with my heart wrapped up in the story, I thoroughly enjoyed it; however I would probably not recommend it to someone not interested in the books. The fault lies in many places, primarily with the tiny budget and screenwriting. Kristen Stewart (Bella) and Robert Pattinson (Edward) did an excellent job of giving us an on screen portrayal of the palpable tension between to two characters; the build-up to the single on screen kiss between the two is practically explosive. That said, the conflicted nature of their love in which Edward is perpetually protecting Bella from himself, was so badly written, it pretty much consisted of him repeatedly and awkwardly saying they couldn’t be friends, unlike the anguished restraint portrayed in the book.  The quivering and stuttering between the two got a little excessive, as did Bella’s open-mouthed stare, but ultimately it got the point across (albeit a bit crudely).

As a fully invested fangirl, I couldn’t help but have mixed emotions when I heard they were making a Twilight movie. The unique quality of these books is that they draw you in so completely that as I have read them, I’ve gone through the motions of love and heartbreak emotionally, and that is an effect no movie can truly give no matter the quality.

Setting aside my caution, I finally dragged myself to the theatre on a bitterly cold weekend, in order to (hopefully) warm up with to this “chick flick”.  Being somewhat biased in favor of the story I desperately want to give this film high marks, but the best I can give is – they did exceptionally well on such a tight budget.

From the start, the character of Bella Swan is self-sacrificing, packing up and moving herself from Phoenix, AZ to the small town of  Forks, Washington to live with her dad, Charlie, so that her mother can start fresh with her new husband.  Bella and her father prove to be essentially strangers living in the same house; their relationship is consistently well-acted and dead-on with the portrayal in the book. Charlie is the endearingly awkward backwoods dad, unsure of how to handle a teenage daughter, and often feigning gruffness when he cares deeply for her.

As someone uniquely qualified (I grew up near Forks in Port Angeles – the town where they go prom-dress-shopping in the movie) to assess the environment, they did an unbelievable job of capturing the area right down to the wooden carved bears and log trucks, and the endless long shots of northwestern beauty is one of the highest points of the film. Bella’s first day at the High School had me doing a double take, wondering if that was the actual Forks High School. From her first day in school, Bella meets the usual characters – the popular kids Mike and Jessica, the overachieving, slightly geeky Eric and Angela, and finally the mysterious Cullen family.